Monday, 27 April 2015


To conclude, I feel that there is a sufficient amount of research evidence to support the issue of needing 100% qualified staff, in early childhood education and care settings. When beginning this blog I was ambivalent as to what my feelings were around centres needing qualified staffing ratios at 100%, in each ECE setting in New Zealand. Thus due to the fact that I knew little about the policies that were in place, and what the now government wanted. After a considerable amount of research and a lot of reading, I have found a majority of evidence that supports my own knowledge and practical work. I have come to the conclusion that national should never have dropped the strategic plan to have 100% qualified staff in ECE.
There is an overwhelming amount of facts placed in front of our eyes if we take the time to research the question, what is quality in early childhood education? The facts show us that the children attending 100% qualified staffing ratios, receive better education and leave with better skills in preparation to become a valued member of society.
I believe common sense has a lot to do with this political issue. The better educated somebody is, the more knowledge they are, they become specialized in their area of expertise. You would not let an untrained doctor perform heart surgery on you? So why let somebody untrained care for your child? 

Early childhood teachers train for 3 or more years, learning about children and how to teach, care and support children as best as possible. As I said in my earlier discussion, we are a multi-disciplinary sector, brain development, policies, politics; environments, art and literacy are just some of the many papers teachers in training work through to receive the, Bachelor of Teaching in Early Childhood degree.  

I believe there is enough evidence that should prompt the National government, into re-assessing their early childhood education policies. Starting with reinstating 100% qualified teaching staff into all early childhood centres in New Zealand. Early childhood is a specialized field; children should receive quality care and education from well trained 100% qualified teachers. We have recognised how important the early years are for development, so why are we not raising the bar on our teaching? 

https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=ece&safe=active&biw=1242&bih=566&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=ezk_Vf6jM8bQmwWlp4F4&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ 
However New Zealand’s National party early childhood minister, Anne Tolley holds an opposing view toward sustainable research evidence, that shows higher educated teachers are providing better quality care and education for young children in early childhood services. Tolley argues there is not enough evidence to show that 100% teacher qualified centres are providing better quality and care than 80% qualified centres.
Kiwi blogger, David Farmer (2010) explains that a skilled qualified teacher is invaluable in observing a child and then knowing how to extend the child’s learning. Although unqualified teachers play a different type of role in a centre compared to a fully qualified teacher, theirs is still a worthy role.
Anne Smith (2010), member of ECE Taskforce, stated there was also little evidence to argue that 100% qualified centres are not better than 80%. ECE Task Force stated in 2011 that, “The result of sustainable evidence based on well-designed longitudinal research studies and cost benefit analysis reveals positive, long-term effects for individuals who have experienced high quality early childhood education compared to individuals who have not” (p.21). This quote shows that through research, children who are under the care of trained early childhood teachers “have slightly higher scores on indicators to do with independence and concentration (which maps on to self-control, a strong predictor of later success in life)” (Meade et al., 2012, p. 100-105).

The ten year strategic plan aimed to improve the likelihood of centres around New Zealand better implementing Te Whᾱriki effectively.  To ensure this, the strategic plan outlined a set of policies around quality and qualified teachers.
Here is some further reading, this article was in the New Zealand herald just under a week ago, in regards to call of inquiry into the quality of early childhood settings in New Zealand: Further reading http://www.nzherald.co.nz/education/news/article.cfm?c_id=35&objectid=11436312



Meade, A., Robinson, L., Smorti, S., Stuart, M., Williamson, J., Carroll-Lind, J.,… Te Whau, S. (2012). Early childhood teachers work in education and care centres: Profiles, patterns and purposes. Retrieved from https://ecnz.ac.nz/assets/RelatedDocuments/Early-Childhood-Teachers-work-in-education-and-carecentres-web-090812.pdf

Smith, A.B. (2010). Defining quality- implementing and holding onto it. Retrieved from www.beststart.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Anne-Smith- NZEI-ECE-Hui-Oct-2013.

Farmer, D. (2010). Do three year olds need 100% teachers? Retrieved from http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/do_three_year_olds_need_100_teachers.html

ECE Taskforce. (2011). An agenda for amazing children: Final report of the ECE Taskforce. Retrieved from http://www.taskforce.ece.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Final_Report_ECE_Taskforce.pdf


In 2002, Ngᾱ Huarahi Arataki released a 10 year strategic plan that would be implemented through the years 2002-2012. Within this strategic plan targets for 100% qualified and registered teachers in teacher-led services were to be carried out. 

Ngᾱ Huarahi Arataki released this plan under the recommendation of future directions. Although the strategy was never written into legislation, Labour’s education ministers, Trevor Mallard and Steve Maharey, signed off the strategy. Therefore, whilst the strategy was signed off by the then government ministers, it is still a strategy only, as it was never a policy and has not been adopted into the legislation of New Zealand under the Ministry of Education (mcguinnessinstitute.org). 


Research conducted by Dalli et al. (2011) shows that quality in early childhood education and care facilities require:
·        Teachers who have knowledge about contemporary developmental theories of learning
·        Teaching staff who have undergone specialised teacher education or professional learning
·        Or teachers who have undertaken professional teacher education programmed in conjunction with practicum courses to integrate theory into practice.
Here I have found some graphs, showing what New Zealand’s statistics look like in terms of qualified teaching staff, in all different types of services provided for children under the age of 5 years old.
Figure 1: Percentage of qualified teachers and percentage of registered teachers (2002-2013)

As you can see from the graph above, in the latest research from 2013, New Zealand as a whole is sitting below the 80% mark.
Figure 3: Percentage of registered teachers by service type (2002 to 2013)

Depending on the level of training needed to become a ‘registered’ or ‘qualified’ teacher. New Zealand as a whole is still falling behind 80%.

Education counts. (n.d.). Teachers in early childhood education. Retrieved from  https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/statistics/ece2/ece-indicators/54190

I believe that children have the right to be taken seriously. Children should have the right to an environment where learning, care, equality and love are nurtured. To do so correctly, I believe that children deserve quality care and education. Dalli et al. (2011) describe the main component to quality as being teachers. The New Zealand Early Childhood Curriculum: Te Whᾱriki, states that the care of young children is a “specialised” field (Ministry of Education,1996, p.17).

As a third year student, I have carried out my studies in Early Childhood Education at both Victoria University of Wellington and the Eastern Institute of Technology. Through both institutions I have undertaken professional education programmes and practical learning. Early childhood education is described as multi-disciplinary by Dalli et al. (2011). This means, as practitioners, teachers draw on research and knowledge from all types of domains within our society. As students studying early childhood education, or teachers undergoing professional development, teachers are accustomed to constantly learning new theories, reading and analysing new research that impact on children and their lives. Therefore, teachers become best educated for the job. This idea aligns with Barnett (2003) who stated that, “new research finds that young children’s learning and development clearly depends on the educational qualifications of their teachers”.

Howes (1997) examined the effects that teacher education has on teacher quality and child development. Howes found the higher the teacher’s education the better the teaching and more engagement by children. Barnett (2003) and Howes (1997) agreed, finding that teachers with the most advanced education and training appear to be the most effective, as they provide more positive, sensitive and responsive interactions with children. Therefore, children have better cognitive development, and social and emotional competency (Barnett, 2003; Howes, 1997).                                                                                                                Berk (2014), states that according to Vygotsky, social interaction in particular, cooperative dialogues with more knowledgeable members of society is necessary for children to acquire the of thinking and behaving that make up a community’s culture. Vygotsky describes this as, cognitive development; a socially mediated process in which children depend on assistance from adults and more expert peers as they tackle new challenges.                                                                                                                       Vygotsky suggests that children are in the zone of proximal development; therefore need help from skilled peer (teachers), to complete tasks. This theory outlines the basis as to how vital the role of the teacher is for quality learning in young children in early childhood education.


Barnett, S. W. (2003). Better teachers, better preschools: Student achievement linked to teacher qualifications. Philadelphia, PA: Rutgers National Institute for Early Educational Research.
Berk, L. (2014). Development through the lifespan. (6th ed).. Boston: Pearson Education.

Dalli, C., White, E.J., Rockel, J., Duhn, I., Bunchanan, E., Davidson, S., … Wang, B. (2011). Quality early childhood education for under-two-year-olds: What should it look like? Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/ECE/Quality_ECE_for_under-two-year-olds/965_QualityECE_Web-22032011.pdf

Howes, M. J. A. (1997). Beyond psychobiography: Towards more effective synthesis of psychology and biography. British Journal of psychology, 1997 (88) 235-248.

McGuiness Institute. (2002). Pathways to the future, Nga Huarahi Arataki: A 10 year strategic plan for early childhood education. Retrieved from http://www.mcguinnessinstitute.org/Site/Projects/NSDS_national_strategy/Government_Strategies/pathways_future.aspx

Ministry of Education. (1996). Te Whᾱriki: He Whᾱriki mᾱtauranga mᾱ ngᾱ mokopuna o Aotearoa – Early childhood curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.


In 1988 a report was commissioned by the government, giving recommendations for the future of early childhood education (ECE) and care services. The Meade report maintained that to provide quality in education, appropriate caregiver qualifications must be upheld (Dalli, et al., 2011).

Smith (2010) explains that, between1999-2008, Labour, a centre left government party in New Zealand, made changes for early childhood care and education. The Labour party aimed to have 100% qualified staff in all early childhood education and care centres in New Zealand by 2012.                                                                                                                     

The election of National, the centre right government party, in November 2008, again made changes in the early childhood education and care sector in New Zealand. There was a shift in policy, with the target of 100% qualified now minimised to 80% (Smith, 2010).  
Here is a brief history of the New Zealand government’s policies around this issue.

1999- New Zealand became a Labour lead government for the fifth year running. Trevor Mallard and Steve Maharey were the Ministers of Education.

2002- Ngᾱ Huarahi Arataki: released a ten year strategic plan 2002-2012 including the targets for 100% qualified and registered teachers in teacher-led services.

2005- Persons responsible in an ECE service are required to have a recognised teaching qualification and be registered teachers.

2008- 50% of staff in teacher lead services required to have an early childhood recognised qualification plus teacher registration.

2008- The National governments new minister of education was appointed to Anne Tolley. The Ngᾱ Huarahi Arataki 100% qualified strategic plan was removed.

2009- 100% qualified, replaced and downgraded to 80% qualified. (beststart, n.d.).


Here are the National and Labour Government party policies from the previous election in 2014.

  • National will continue to aim for 98 per cent of children starting school having participated in ECE in 2016
  • Support an estimated 5,800 more children to attend ECE by June 2018.
  • Provide a $53.6 million boost to subsidy rates to help ECE providers meet rising costs
  • Implement the Early Learning Information system to provide valuable information about ECE to help maximise learning outcomes
  • Ensure funding is fair and sustainable by:
  • 1.    Retaining 20 hours ECE.
  • 2.    Working with ECE providers to reduce bureaucracy. (more here) (Palmer, 2014).

·         Labour will 
  • introduce 25 hours of Free Early Childhood Education for New Zealand’s three, four and five year old children, an increase from 20 hours
  • The policy will save all families with a three, four or five year old in ECE full-time or nearly full-time around $25 each week
  • Labour will extend the policy of Free Early Childhood Education for the most vulnerable children earlier than three years of age
  • Labour will restore over time National’s funding for highly qualified ECE centres. We will work with the sector to reinstate the policy of 100 percent qualified staff in all teacher-led services
  • We will build more ECE centres in high-need areas so there are enough places for kids who need them. (more here) (Palmer, 2014). 


Best Start. (n.d). History of early childhood education in the context of the union movement. Retrieved from www.beststart.org.nz/history/

Dalli, C., White, E.J., Rockel, J., Duhn, I., Bunchanan, E., Davidson, S., … Wang, B. (2011). Quality early childhood education for under-two-year-olds: What should it look like? Retrieved from https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/ECE/Quality_ECE_for_under-two-year-olds/965_QualityECE_Web-22032011.pdf

Palmer, S. (2014). Election 2014- Party Policies- Early childhood Education. Retrieved from http://www.interest.co.nz/news/70566/election-2014-party-policies-early-childhood-education  


Smith, A.B. (2010). Defining quality- implementing and holding onto it. Retrieved from www.beststart.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Anne-Smith- NZEI-ECE-Hui-Oct-2013

Wednesday, 11 March 2015

My political issue is a question: What is the level of qualification for teachers in early childhood care and education that would provide a quality service? This debate has been ongoing for the past 15 years.
I am interested in this political issue because there is evidence that suggests children’s education is being negatively affected by the policy change to 50%- 80% qualified teaching staff. Early Childhood Council CEO Peter Reynolds (2014), argued that “Low quality care should not be acceptable anywhere in the early childhood sector, and certainly not for our most at-risk of children- the ones for whom a quality early childhood education could mean the difference between job and jail.” Therefore I am researching the level of qualification required to provide quality early childhood care and education.


Early Childhood Council. (2014). Verdict on Government’s early childhood education record: Quantity up, quality down. Retrieved from http://www.ecc.org.nz/Category?Action=View&Category_id=444&Highlight=Qualifications&Search_Terms=Qualifications.

 https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=ece&safe=active&biw=1242&bih=566&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=ezk_Vf6jM8bQmwWlp4F4&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ